I'm really proud to call them all my own now. And, moreover, every one of the five ever built Instamatic SLRs is in very good condition. Due to lack of available film I'll probably never really will take pictures with them ever again. Here is the promised comparison in tabular form:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Keystone | Zeiss Ikon | Kodak | Rollei | Ricoh |
K-1020 | Contaflex 126 | Instamatic Reflex | Rolleiflex SL26 | 126C-flex |
Japan | Germany | Germany | Germany | Japan |
1966-? | 1967-1971 | 1968-1974 | 1968-1973 | 1969-1972 |
$99 - |
$159.95 399 DM |
$199 499 DM |
$299.50 628 DM |
$119.95 299 DM |
Selen cell, extern one shutter speed shutter-priority autoexposure |
CdS-TTL cloth focal plane shutter, shutter-priority autoexposure |
CdS, extern Compur electronic leaf shutter, aperture-priority autoexposure |
CdS, TTL Compur leaf shutter match-needle metering, manual |
CdS, TTL Copal leaf shutter manual and shutter priority autoexpos. |
48/2.8 Keytar (build-in) |
45/2.8 Zeiss Pantar interchangable |
45/2.8 Xenar interchangable |
40/2.8 Tessar set-lenses |
55/2.8 Rikenon |
- | 5 lenses available | DKL mount, >15 lenses |
2 set-lenses avail. (28 mm, 80mm) |
2 lenses, screew mount |
30,000* | about 25,000 | 75,775+ | 28,570 | 30,000 - 50,000* |
As you can see at the production figures (* own estimate), none of them really was a hit. That's somehow not surprising. The Instamatic cartridge had (justifiably) the reputation of being suitable only for simple and inexpensive cameras. In particular, since the film flatness could not be adequately ensured. Therefore, the potential of high-performance lenses could not be utilized. Camera manufacturers should have been aware of that actually. Why then build a SLR even with interchangeable lenses?
Well, we are at the end of the 60s. The global camera market was on the rise for almost all camera classes. More and more cameras also reached into households, where never has been photographed before. And those amateurs with viewfinder cameras squinted forward to the SLRs. Therefore it is less surprising that the camera manufacturers tryed to occupy strange niches. The motives of the 5 manufacturers here were naturally not quite the same. But all had to deal with these cameras to perform a balancing act between the technical seriousness of the SLR and the demand for simplicity of the 126er cartridge. They all succeeded more or less. The two poles are the simple Keystone and the serious Contaflex. The Ricoh seems somehow not thought right to the end. The most successful - I think - are the Kodak and the Rollei. The well done system integration speaks for the Kodak, while the Rollei stands out the most by her excellent and consistent design as well as best execution.
However, latest in 1972 all understood that the Instamatic cartridge and high-end cameras do not fit together. But history repeats itself sometimes. As I have already posted, there was also the "new" Instamatic cartridge of the '70s (110, "Pocket Film") and of course again SLRs. Two out of three available I have in my collection (Pentax Auto 110 and Minolta 110 Zoom). And in the mid '90s there was a short appearance of APS SLR's, of which there are only a few models from five manufacturers.
However, latest in 1972 all understood that the Instamatic cartridge and high-end cameras do not fit together. But history repeats itself sometimes. As I have already posted, there was also the "new" Instamatic cartridge of the '70s (110, "Pocket Film") and of course again SLRs. Two out of three available I have in my collection (Pentax Auto 110 and Minolta 110 Zoom). And in the mid '90s there was a short appearance of APS SLR's, of which there are only a few models from five manufacturers.
General Links: Mr. Martin's 126 page, University of Texas' 126 camera directory, 126 Cartridge (Camera-wiki)