2014-05-25

Japanese SLR production numbers. Part 2: Minolta

And here comes chapter 2 of my production number assessment for Japanese 135 film SLR's. Today's camera producer is Chiyoda Kogaku, later renamed after their most famous brand Minolta. Their first SLR was theSR-2 and this assessment was actually the reason (or better: the trigger) that I bought this lovely camera. Compared to the Nikon evaluation this was more tricky and probably less accurate. Minolta had by far more single models on the market, they implemented technical improvements or other changes sometimes every year. In addition, during the early 70ies they started selling the same cameras under different names in the three main markets. Just one example: The XD in Japan was a XD11 in the US and a XD7 in Europe. I did just a few cross checks with my production number estimation method. My main source was this quite comprehensive french web site, also very helpful were the Rokkor Files as well as other resources like camera-wiki.org

The SR series was actually an amazing success for Minolta. With very modern and beautiful design and technology it set benchmarks for the rest of the industry. Minolta always focused rather on the average photographer than on the professionals like Nikon did in the beginning. That explains their higher sales in the early sixties. The most advanced model of this series, the SR-7 was the first SLR with a build in CdS-Meter, no TTL yet, though...

TTL metering only came wit the  SR-T series.  However, in contrast to the competition (e.g. Pentax Spotmatic) from the beginning at full aperture. The series comprises abot 10 different models, which have been sold undere different names on forreign markets, what makes it quite confusing. Technically, all the modells are very similar to the main type SR-T 101. That made it difficult to estimate accurate production numbers. Sometimes, you don#t even know, whether sources speak about just one modell oder the entire series.

Although a few professionals used the solid SR-T cameras, Minolta did not have a dedicated model for the pro market. That changed in 1973 with the introduction of the XM/XK. Not very successful, though, as production numbers stayed small. Minolta had a cooperation with Leitz in those days and actually developed its ambitious model XE, which became the basis for the Leica R3. The most interesting and successful camera for the semi-pro segment was the XD (7/11, see above) introducing a choice between aperture and shutter priority automation.
"Only" about 1.4 million cameras of the XE/XD series have been sold over a decade, during the seventies this was probably not enough to keep up with the competition. But Minolta understood, what the market was looking for. In 1977 they took their technology from XE and casted it into a more compact mass consumer camera. The XG series was born and sold about 3.4 million times in just 7 years. Technically all the XG models are very similar. 

With the XG series Minolta eventually realized where their strength are. They consequently discontinued the XM pro-series, took the basic design of the XG, added some technology and features from the XD and put all efforts into an "optimal" SLR: The X-700 was born and got a best and long seller. Minolta offered stripped down versions for lower prices targeting the mass consumer market quite successfully. In the early '90ies they transferred production to China. However, for me it is still unknown when and I decided to stop counting in 1993. 

The biggest change came when Minolta took it to the next level in 1985. They introduced Autofocus and the Minolta (Maxxum) 7000 AF. This brilliant coup put them into the market leader position for the next coming years. Read what happened finally in my post. However, this is not part of this assessment. Overall, from 1958 to 1993 Minolta sold about 14.8 million SLR's with the SR mount. As I said in the beginning, I'm not that confident with the numbers as I was with the Nikon stuff. It might be on the high side, but who knows. Some sources say, they were very successful in emerging markets like China and probably sold a lot there, too. Here are the details per model as a table:

Minolta …

also marketed as…

from

to

Numbers produced

SR-2 1958 1960       20,000
SR-3 1960 1962     180,000
SR-7 1962 1966     700,000
SR-1 1959 1967  1,160,000
SR-1s 1968 1971     130,000
SR-T 101 1966 1976  2,500,000
SR-T 100 1971 1975     130,000
SR-T 303 SR-T Super, SR-T 102  1973 1976     500,000
SR-T 101b SR-T 201, SR 101 1977 1981     200,000
SRT-303b SR-T 202, SR 505 1977 1980     200,000
SRT 100X SR-T 200 1977 1981     100,000
XM X-1, XK 1973 1981       51,000
XE-1 XE, XE-7 1974 1977     500,000
XE-5 1975 1977     100,000
XD5 1977 1984     150,000
XD7 XD, XD11 1979 1984     600,000
XG 1 1978 1982  1,500,000
XG-SE 1978 1978       20,000
XG 9 XG-S 1979 1981     250,000
XG-M X-70 1981 1983     500,000
X-7 XG-A 1980 1984     100,000
X-700 1981 1999  2,100,000
X-500 X-570 1983 1985     350,000
X-300 X-370,

continued

in China
1984 1993  1,800,000

3 Kommentare:

  1. Der Kommentar wurde von einem Blog-Administrator entfernt.

    AntwortenLöschen
  2. You have to watch out with your production estimates for the SR series. Minolta used the same serial number series for the lower priced model, SR-1, as the concurrent higher priced models, SR-2, SR-3 and SR-7. Take the SR-1 models concurrent with the SR-3 and the SR-3 itself. The serial numbers from 1143886-1299999 and 1400001-1425306 are shared between both, so that means that 181,420 total between the SR-3 (all models) and the concurrent SR-1 models. I have records of 540 copies of just these cameras, and most are for the SR-1. If we knew the exact ratio of production of the SR-1 and SR-3, we could estimate how many of each were made. Estimate 2 to 1 and we could guess around 61,000 SR-3 cameras were produced.

    AntwortenLöschen
    Antworten
    1. Thanks so much. I always appreciate first hand research and of course trust your judgement. As the SR-3 had a relatively short production time, but the SR-1 was produced throughout the entire series, how would you estimate the numbers for the series above...?

      Löschen